AIR-IAB Expresses Concern Over Actions That May Restrict Political Criticism and Satire in Mexico
The International Association of Broadcasting (AIR-IAB) expresses its concern over the complaint filed by the Morena party with Mexico’s National Electoral Institute (INE), requesting the removal of publications and the suspension of content related to “La Casa de los Mañosos,” a political satire created by third parties and subsequently aired in TV Azteca’s news programming.
AIR-IAB recalls that criticism, satire, and political humor are legitimate forms of expression that have historically played an important role in public debate and in the scrutiny of those who exercise governmental authority.
In a democratic society, public officials, political leaders, and political parties—and especially those who exercise power—are subject to a greater degree of public scrutiny and must demonstrate particular tolerance toward criticism, questioning, and satire related to their public conduct.
AIR-IAB views with concern the use of institutional mechanisms to seek the removal or prevent the dissemination of critical or satirical expression. Intervention by public authorities regarding this type of content must be subject to particularly rigorous scrutiny, as it may generate a chilling effect that extends beyond the media outlet or expression directly involved and discourages the free exercise of journalism and public debate.
AIR-IAB also recalls that the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary recently struck down provisions of the radio and television monitoring methodology for the 2026–2027 electoral process related to indirect mechanisms for discrediting candidates, finding that they were based on subjective parameters that could inhibit freedom of expression and journalistic activity, as well as affect citizens’ right to receive pluralistic information.
The protection of freedom of expression is particularly important precisely with regard to ideas, opinions, and expressions that question or challenge those in power. State institutions must not become arbiters of political criticism or be used as instruments to determine which opinions, criticisms, or satirical expressions may circulate in public debate.
This does not mean that freedom of expression is absolute or that the media are exempt from responsibilities established by law. It means that any restriction must strictly comply with constitutional guarantees and international standards on freedom of expression, avoiding mechanisms of prior censorship or disproportionate measures that may inhibit democratic debate.
The International Association of Broadcasting (AIR-IAB) respectfully calls upon the National Electoral Institute and other competent authorities in Mexico to ensure that any action related to this case is taken in strict respect for freedom of expression and freedom of the press, the editorial independence of the media, and society’s right to receive diverse information, opinions, and forms of expression.
Democracy requires strong institutions, independent media, and authorities and political actors capable of coexisting with scrutiny, criticism, and also satire.
Montevideo, September 7, 2026.